The framework

Eight stages of careful thought

Each stage isolates one source of belief, so you can examine it on its own terms before combining them into a decision. The goal isn't certainty — it's clarity about what kind of confidence you actually have.

  1. 01

    Perception

    Direct evidence

    What you directly observe

    What do you observe?

    Stick to what you can actually observe — not interpretation.

  2. 02

    Memory

    Recall

    What you remember

    What do you remember from past experience?

    Memory is reconstructive. Note when something is uncertain.

  3. 03

    Testimony

    Sources

    What others have told you

    What have you been told? Who said it?

    Name the source. Unverified testimony is weak evidence.

  4. 04

    Reason

    Logic

    Your logical chain

    What is your core argument? Walk through the logic step by step.

    Use 'because' and 'therefore' to make the chain explicit.

  5. 05

    Assumptions & Inference

    Assumptions

    Conclusions and the assumptions bridging them

    What are you assuming? What conclusions follow?

    Every gap between evidence and conclusion is an assumption.

  6. 06

    Structure

    Framing

    How it fits the bigger picture

    How does this fit the wider system or context?

    Zoom out. What else is connected to this decision?

  7. 07

    Knowledge

    Prior knowledge

    Know vs. believe vs. guess

    What do you actually know vs. believe vs. guess?

    Be honest. Most 'knowing' is actually believing.

  8. 08

    Skepticism

    Self-criticism

    What a thoughtful critic would say

    What could be wrong? What's the strongest counter-argument?

    If you can't argue against it, you don't yet understand it.

How scoring works

Each stage scores 0–10 based on depth, specificity, and the presence of stage-appropriate signals (named sources for testimony, explicit assumptions for inference, counter-arguments for skepticism). Reason, inference and skepticism are weighted higher. Confidence is penalised when skepticism or inference are weak — strong reasoning without strong self-criticism is not a high-confidence belief.